Saturday, 7 January 2017

" DESIGN OF 400KV/220 KV SUBSTATION "

INCLUDES

  • OVERVIEW OF 400 KV SUB-STATION
  • DESIGN PROCESS
  • DESIGN CONSIDRATION
  • QUESTION AND ANSWER   

IMORTANT CONSIDRARTION IN SUBSTATION DESIGN

  •  SAFETY ON PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENTS
  • RELIABILITY AND SECURITY
  • ADHERENCE TO - 
                                        *STATUORY OBLIGATION - I.E RULES, ENVIORNMENTAL                                                            ASPECTS
                                        *ELECTRICAL DESIGN CONSIDRATIONS
                                        *STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDRATIONS

  • EASE OF MAINTAINANCE
  • POSSIBILTY TO EXPAND

SYSTEM PARAMETERS


Thursday, 5 January 2017

ARMATURE REACTION IN DC GENERATOR



Armature Reaction in DC Generator


To understand the concept of armature reaction in DC generator, please go through the previous articles describing the construction and working of DC generator. The concept of armature reaction is well explained in this article.

There are two windings in a dc generator and a dc motor:

  • Field winding 
  • Armature winding. 
The purpose of field winding is to produce magnetic field (called main flux) whereas the purpose of armature winding is to carry armature current. 

Although the armature winding is not provided for the purpose of producing a magnetic field, still the current in the armature winding also produces a magnetic flux (called armature flux). 

The armature flux distorts and weakens the main flux and create problems for the proper operation of the dc machines. The action of armature flux on the main flux is called armature reaction in a dc generator.

The phenomenon of armature reaction in a dc generator is shown in figure below. For the sake of clarity we are taking only one pole. 

Figure (i)
When the generator is on no-load, a small current is flowing through the armature and therefore flux produced in the armature is very small and it does not affect the main flux φ1 coming from the pole.
Figure (ii)
When the generator is loaded, high current start flowing through the armature conductors, thus a high flux φ2 is set up as shown in fig (ii). 
Figure (iii)
By superimposing the fluxes φ1 and φ2, we obtain the resulting flux φ3 as shown in fig (iii). This is what happens to the flux under one pole under armature reaction in a dc generatorFrom fig (iii) it is clear that flux density at the trailing pole tip (point B) is increased while at the leading pole tip (point A) it is decreased. 

This unequal field distribution due to armature reaction in dc generator produces the following two effects:
  1. The main flux is distorted.
  2. The main Flux is weakened.
The weakening of flux due to armature reaction in a dc generator also depends on the position of the brushes. For that we need to understand the geometrical and magnetic neutral axes.

    Geometrical and Magnetic Neutral Axes

    The geometrical neutral axis and magnetic neutral axis should be clearly understood in order to get a clear idea of armature reaction in a dc generator.
    • The geometrical neutral axis (GNA.) is the axis that bisects the angle between the centre line of adjacent poles.
    • The magnetic neutral axis (MNA.) is the axis drawn perpendicular to the mean direction of the flux passing through the centre of the armature. Noo e.m.f. is produced in the armature conductors along this axis because then they cut no flux. When no current is there in the armature conductors, the MNA coincides with GNA.

    Explanation of Armature Reaction

    The armature reaction in a dc generator is explained as below,

    Consider no current in armature conductors, then MNA coincides with GNA. Now, when current start flowing through the armature conductors, due to the combined action of main flux and armature flux the MNA get shifted from GNA. In case of a generator, the M.N.A. is shifted in the direction of rotation of the machine. In order to achieve sparkless commutation, the brushes should be moved along the new MNA. 
    Under such a condition, the armature reaction in a dc generator produces the following two effects:

    1. It demagnetizes or weakens the main flux.
    2. It cross-magnetizes or distorts the main flux.
    Let us discuss these effects of armature reaction in a dc generator by considering a 2-pole generator (though the following remarks also hold good for a multipolar generator). 
    1. Fig (i) shows the flux due to main poles (main flux) when the armature conductors carry no current. The flux across the air gap is uniform. The m.m.f. producing the main flux is represented in magnitude and direction by the vector OFm in fig (i). Note that OFm is perpendicular to GNA.
    2. Fig (ii) shows the flux due to current flowing in armature conductors of dc generator alone (main poles unexcited). The armature conductors to the left of GNA. carry current “in” (×) and those to the right carry current “out” (•). The direction of magnetic lines of force can be found by cork screw rule. It is clear that armature flux is directed downward parallel to the brush axis. The m.m.f. producing the armature flux is represented in magnitude and direction by the vector OFA in fig (ii).
    3. Fig (iii) shows the flux due to the main poles and that due to current in armature conductors acting together. The resultant m.m.f. OF is the vector sum of OFm and OFA as shown in fig (iii). Since MNA. is always perpendicular to the resultant m.m.f., the MNA. is shifted through an angle θ. Note that MNA. is shifted in the direction of rotation of the generator.
    4. In order to achieve sparkless commutation, the brushes must lie along the MNA. Consequently, the brushes are shifted through an angle θ so as to lie along the new MNA. as shown in Fig (iv). Due to brush shift, the m.m.f. FA of the armature is also rotated through the same angle θ. It is because some of the conductors which were earlier under N-pole now come under S-pole and vice-versa. The result is that armature m.m.f. FA will no longer be vertically downward but will be  rotated in the direction of rotation through an angle θ as shown in Fig (iv). Now FA can be resolved into rectangular components Fc and Fd.
        • (a) The component Fd is in direct opposition to the m.m.f. OFm due to main poles. It has a demagnetizing effect on the flux due to main poles. For this reason, it is called the demagnetizing or weakening component of armature reaction in dc machines.
        • (b) The component Fc is at right angles to the m.m.f. OFm due to main poles. It distorts the main field. For this reason, it is called the cross magnetizing or distorting component of armature reaction in dc machines.
      It may be noted that with the increase of armature current, both demagnetizing and distorting effects will increase.

      LOSSES IN DC MACHINE

      LOSSES IN DC MACHINE 

      The losses in a dc machine (generator or motor) may be divided into three classes viz 

      (i) Copper losses 
      (ii) Iron or core losses and 
      (iii) Mechanical losses. 

      All these losses appear as heat and thus raise the temperature of the machine. They also lower the efficiency of the machine.

      Copper losses

      These losses occur due to currents in the various windings of the machine.
      1. Armature copper loss = Ia2Ra
      2. Shunt field copper loss = Ish2Rsh
      3. Series field copper loss = Ise2Rse
      Note. There is also brush contact loss due to brush contact resistance (i.e., resistance between the surface of brush and surface of commutator). This loss is generally included in armature copper loss.

      Iron or Core losses


      These losses occur in the armature of a d.c. machine and are due to the rotation of armature in the magnetic field of the poles. They are of two types viz., (i) hysteresis loss (ii) eddy current loss.

      (i) Hysteresis loss

      Hysteresis loss occurs in the armature of the d.c. machine since any given part of the armature is subjected to magnetic field reversals as it passes under successive poles.

      Figure shows an armature rotating in two-pole machine. Consider a small piece ab of the 
      armature. When the piece ab is under N-pole, the magnetic lines pass from a to b. Half a revolution later, the same piece of iron is under S-pole and magnetic lines pass from b to a so that magnetism in the iron is reversed. In order to reverse continuously the molecular magnets in the armature core, some amount of power has to be spent which is called hysteresis loss. It is given by Steinmetz formula. This formula is


      Hysteresis loss Ph = η Bmax1.6 f V

                  where Bmax = Maximum flux density in armature
                              f  = Frequency of magnetic reversals
                                 = NP/120 where N is in r.p.m.
                              V = Volume of armature in m3
                              h = Steinmetz hysteresis co-efficient

      In order to reduce this loss in a d.c. machine, armature core is made of such materials which have a low value of Steinmetz hysteresis co-efficient e.g.,silicon steel.

      (ii) Eddy current loss

      In addition to the voltages induced in the armature conductors, there are also voltages induced in the armature core. These voltages produce circulating currents in the armature core as shown in Fig. These are called eddy currents and power loss due to their flow is called eddy current loss. The eddy current loss appears as heat which raises the temperature of the machine and lowers its efficiency.

      If a continuous solid iron core is used, the resistance to eddy current path will be small due to large cross-sectional area of the core. Consequently, the magnitude of eddy current and hence eddy current loss will be large. The magnitude of eddy current can be reduced by making core resistance as high as practical. The core resistance can be greatly increased by constructing the core of thin, round iron sheets called laminations. The laminations are insulated from each other with a coating of varnish. The insulating coating has a high resistance, so very little current flows from one lamination to the other. Also, because each lamination is very thin, the resistance to current flowing through the width of a lamination is also quite large. Thus laminating a core increases the core resistance which decreases the eddy current and hence the eddy current loss.

      Eddy current loss Pe = KBmax f2 t2 V 

                 where Ke = Constant depending upon the electrical resistance of core and system of units used
                             Bmax = Maximum flux density in Wb/m2
                             f = Frequency of magnetic reversals in Hz
                             t = Thickness of lamination in m
                             V = Volume of core in m3

      It may be noted that eddy current loss depends upon the square of lamination thickness. For this reason, lamination thickness should be kept as small as possible.

      Mechanical losses

      These losses are due to friction and windage.
      (i) friction loss e.g., bearing friction, brush friction etc.
      (ii) windage loss i.e., air friction of rotating armature.
      These losses depend upon the speed of the machine. But for a given speed, they are practically constant.
      Note. Iron losses and mechanical losses together are called stray losses.
       
       PLEASE READ MORE ARTICLES HERE  ELELCTRICAL TECH FAMILY